maya shabat.
Back to selected work

02 / AI PRODUCT DESIGN · UX/UI · DESIGN SYSTEMS

Kolla

Making AI feedback clear enough to act on.

Kolla is an AI-powered document assessment and feedback platform. Working alongside the founding team, I helped shape its first usable product experience, turning complex AI-generated assessment results into an interface people can understand and act on.

MY ROLE
UX/UI Specialist
TIMELINE
January–June 2026
TOOLS
Figma · FigJam
WHAT I CONTRIBUTED
Brand identity, wireframes, user flows, interface architecture, interactive prototypes, and the design system with paired light and dark modes, working alongside the founding and engineering team.
Kolla dark-mode dashboard designKolla essay assessment interface design
01 / PROJECT OVERVIEW

Shape a first version, and a language that can scale.

The brief was to design the first version of an AI-powered grading and assessment tool and establish a visual language that could grow with the product.

TEAM

A small founding team

I worked with the founders, a product manager, an AI engineer, and a developer. The AI technology and application code were built by the engineering team.

MY SCOPE

From structure to interface

Brand identity, wireframes, user flows, interactive prototypes, and interface design.

Design objective

Make complex AI feedback feel clear, trustworthy, and fast to act on.

02 / UNDERSTANDING THE PROBLEM

A complicated output needed a simple experience.

Academic institutions and companies needed a faster way to evaluate documents (assignments, reports, and applications) using consistent, transparent criteria.

01

Complex AI output

Technical assessment results had to become something educators and students could understand immediately.

02

Simple workflows

Submitting a document and reading the result needed to feel short and predictable.

03

No design system yet

Designing at an early stage meant defining components, hierarchy, and tone from scratch.

The challenge: reduce complexity without making the AI feel like a black box. The work started with structure, hierarchy, and trust, not decoration.

03 / USERS & REQUIREMENTS

Different goals. One interaction model.

USER GROUP

Educators

Review and grade faster.

USER GROUP

Students

Understand feedback and improve.

USER GROUP

HR & recruiters

Assess documents consistently.

Shared requirements

  • Upload documents easily
  • Understand AI feedback clearly
  • Review assessments quickly and accurately

Design implication: one simple path, repeated patterns, and readable feedback blocks.

04 / UX STRATEGY & PLANNING

Principles that filtered every decision.

01

Reduce cognitive load

Prioritize only the information needed for the next action.

02

Clear hierarchy

Make scores, feedback, and calls to action instantly scannable.

03

Predictable upload-to-feedback

Keep upload and analysis flows short and consistent.

04

Trust through consistency

Consistent components, spacing, and interface language build confidence.

A fifth principle, accessible by default, meant readable type, sufficient contrast, and parallel light and dark modes.

05 / CORE USER FLOW

Enter. Choose. Submit. Understand. Improve.

EntryLanding / login
WorkspaceDashboard
Choose toolEssay · plagiarism · citations
InputUpload / paste / link
AI reviewAnalyze criteria
ResultScores + feedback
RefineRevise / re-check

The same mental model supports multiple modules, so users don’t need to relearn the product when they move from one tool to another.

06 / VISUAL IDENTITY & DESIGN SYSTEM

Tech-forward, yet still academic.

Midnight navy foundations, electric purple and blue accents, and soft translucent cards make the AI feel modern without becoming visually noisy.

Midnight
Electric purple
AI blue
Soft white

Component language: rounded cards, soft glow, compact labels, clear states, and restrained gradients, applied consistently across light and dark modes.

07 / FINAL INTERFACE DESIGNS

One structure, two modes.

Dashboard

Resume recent work, launch a tool, see assessment status

Product modules

Citations · Input → source metadata → confirmation
Essay checker · Score + contextual feedback

Landing page

Landing · Dark
Landing · Light

Concept designs. The “4.8/5 from 1,200+ students” rating and the “Trusted by high school students worldwide” line are placeholder copy written for the mockups, not Kolla performance data.

Login & registration

Login · Dark
Login · Light
Sign up · Dark
Sign up · Light

Original design screens from my Kolla presentation. Design deliverables, not a record of which features are live.

08 / DESIGN DECISIONS

Structure that carries across tools.

DECISION

Easier navigation between tools

Essay, plagiarism, and citation tools are one click from the dashboard, and navigation stays the same in every module.

DECISION

Clearer feedback presentation

Scores surface as compact status cards; detailed feedback is grouped by category beside the text.

DECISION

Reusable interaction patterns

Each module follows input → review → result, so controls and feedback conventions transfer.

DECISION

Light/dark consistency

Screens were designed as pairs, keeping the same hierarchy in both themes.

09 / OUTCOMES & LEARNINGS

A complete interface system.

By the end of the project, one design language spanned acquisition, onboarding, workspace, and assessment workflows, delivered as a full design system and interface set, reviewed in weekly sessions with the founders.

LEARNING 01

Designing AI means designing explanations, not just outputs.

LEARNING 02

A reusable interaction pattern is what makes a multi-tool platform feel coherent.

LEARNING 03

Light/dark parity works best when planned from the component level.

EXPLORE THE NEXT PROJECT

Wix MobileSync